The two indicators I will
be using are Bollinger Bands and stochastic relative strength index
(StochR SI ). StochRSI , which combines the features of stochastics
and RSI , was
detailed in Tushar S.
Chande and Stanley Kroll’s book, The New Technical Trader. I
selected this combination because it is a useful way to determine
when prices will stop tagging a Bollinger Band and are likely to move
all the way from one band to the next. Of course, those prices may
not move all the way, so you will need to use stops for protection.
You will also want to use a simple money management strategy of
allocating only a portion of your capital to any one position.
First, let’s take a
look at R SI and StochRSI . Stochastics, you will recall, is simply
a way of measuring, for a given period of time, where today’s close
is relative to the lowest low, and where within the range of the
highest high and lowest low the price falls over the same time
period. The formula for stochastics for a 14-day period is:
Today'sclose–
Lowestlowofthelast14 days/
Highesthighofthelast14
days– Lowestlowofthelast14 days
Note the use of range —
high minus low — in the denominator of the calculation.
Many trading techniques
and strategies are built around range in some form, and if you use
several indicators, you want independent sources, so that the
indicators independently confirm one another.
Independent confirmation
is one part of Dow theory you should consider embracing. For example,
Larry Williams’ %R is the reverse of stochastics, substituting the
difference of highest high
over a given period minus
today’s close for the numerator. So if you want to use this
indicator together with stochastics, you are not using independent
indicators.
Instead, you should
consider using an indicator that does not involve a range, such as
volume, or one that is statistical in nature, such as Bollinger
Bands.
The next step is to
identify the type of stock that will work best. If you are going to
use an indicator that relies on price volatility such as StochR SI ,
then you should examine your charts to see the
nature of the current
volatility. For example, I have used AOL Time Warner (AOL ) in
Figure 1. What differentiates the four areas (A, B, C, and D) is the
combination of price and volume
volatility. Area A has
low price and high volume volatility. Area B has both high price and
volume volatility. Area C has high price volatility, and low volume
volatility for the stock.
Finally, area D has
moderate volume and price volatility. A useful rule to remember is
that a price is “in gear” — that is, in sync — if price goes
up on high volume or down on lowered volume. Prices that reflect such
moves are prices that the market is comfortable with. If you were
long in area A or
short in area D, you
would have done well. A trading system designed for areas A and D —
“ingear” moves — is likely to have a terrible time in areas B
and C. As you will discover shortly, AOL represents the good, the
bad, the ugly, and the really ugly when it comes to using a trading
system that only takes long positions.
Stochastic RSI VS RSI
RSI VS . STOCH RSI If
you compare RSI and StochRSI measurements over a few months, you
will notice a difference:
One of them will hit the extreme faster and tend to stay near the
extreme better than the other. The formula for StochRSI for a 14-day
period is:
RSI–
LowestRSIoverthelast14 days/
HighestRSIoverthelast14
days– LowestRSIoverthelast14 days
If you build this
indicator, of course, you can make the RSI use a 14-day period or
you can, for example, make the RSI based on a nine day period and
retain the 14 days for the stochastics portion. As you can see from
Figure 2, StochRSI does a better job of hitting its extreme and
staying there than R SI does. StochR SI allows you to draw a line
that acts as a threshold line better than RSI (black lines drawn
within green boxes). While bothRSI and StochRSI range between zero
and one — although cosmetic adjustments are made to RSI so it
appears to range between zero and 100 — StochRSI hits its extreme
faster because you are only looking at the RSI over a recent lookback
period. Still, there are times, as in April, when StochRSI gives you
a mixed message.
This is where Bollinger
Bands can help. If you overlay price with Bollinger Bands, as in
Figure 3, you begin to get an idea of the setup for a long position:
Act when prices are
tagging the lower band (point A) with a move up (point B), while
StochRSI shows a significant gain in value (point C). However, this
setup has potential problems for long trades; look at the red box in
the chart. In April and May 2000, you have examples of prices tagging
the lower band and then closing above. In one instance (event D),
StochR SI would potentially give a confirming signal that you should
go long, but then prices go back down to the lower band. This is an
example of the problem I referred to earlier, that low volume is
often
accompanied by
randomness. Note that volume in late April and May is significantly
lower than in the preceding time frame. I will try to incorporate
some rules into the trading system to account for this, but in such a
situation it is often best to exit and find another stock.
I will now execute a
trading system, without stops and money management, to see what it
can do. The trading system is going to have the following trading
rules for a long position:
Entry:
1 Look for prices tagging
the lower Bollinger Band
2 Look for a closing
price of an up day, that is (close>open), that is above the lower
band after having prices follow (1)
3 Volume of this up day
should be greater than the volume of the previous up day
4 StochR SI should be
above a threshold to ensure some momentum is associated with the push
up
5 The
(close-open)/(high-low)>0.2, to avoid days that have short
candlestick bodies.
Exit:
1 StochR SI should be
less than a threshold to assure loss of momentum
2 Look for prices to
reach the upper band
3 Closing price should be
near the top Bollinger Band.
You are looking for the
stock to continue up if it has been tagging a lower Bollinger Band
and then made a convincing move up, so that it conforms to entry
rules 2 through 5 above. I used weighted closes in calculating the
Bollinger Bands:
(2*close+high+low)/4.
From Figure 4 you can see
that investing $1,000 in 1997 and using this trading system without stops resulted in $58,000
(second chart from top), which beat buy/ hold by more than $47,000.
However, there are serious drawdowns in each of the areas B, C, and
D. The only factor that varied in this trading system was the number
of periods for StochRSI and Bollinger Bands. When using the initial
version of this system I optimized the StochR SI thresholds as well.
The equity looked better in terms of drawdowns and ended up with
$300,000+, which led me to believe that there might be something to
this approach.
Optimizing on everything
— from periods to thresholds — results in spectacular equity
performance (Figure 5), and although it is curve-fitting, it shows
the potential you are trying to
achieve. It also shows
the trading system is biased to take advantage of strong
uptrends: During
uptrends, prices that tag the bottom Bollinger Band will
move to the upper band,
resulting in a trading system that can do much better than buy and
hold. But letting thresholds optimize curve-fits the performance too
much, so I set the thresholds visually. To get rid of the serious
drawdowns, I used maximum loss stops of 5%, which improved the equity
performance (Figure 4: top chart). Still, area B just eats away at
your equity, although it does appear I took care of the low volume
problem in area C.
Post a Comment